Thursday, May 30, 2019

Boston Massacre Essay -- essays research papers

The capital of Massachusetts Massacre is considered by many historians to be the first battle of the Revolutionary War. The fatal incident happened on butt 5 of 1770. The butchery resulted in the death of five colonists. British troops in the Massachusetts Bay Colony were there to stop demonstrations against the Townshend Acts and keep order, but instead they raise outrage. The British soldiers and citizens brawled in streets and fought in bars. &8220The citizens viewed the British soldiers as potential oppressors, competitors for jobs, and a treat to social mores (Mahin 1). A defiant anti-British fever was lingering among the townspeople.There ar three major things that led to the Boston Massacre First was the growing mistrust among the British soldiers and Americans. There were a number of other incidents were the British clashed with the patriots and their supporters. man-to-man soldiers were beaten on street corners and soldiers abused unarmed civilians. In all the America ns in Boston made it clear that the British soldiers were unwanted.The second reason is jolly odd. The removal of two out of four regiments meant there were to inadequate amounts of soldiers to keep the peace. There were enough on the other hand to remind the patriots of the great British military.The last reason would be the revolt of the Townshend Acts. The patriots and Americans did not agree and strife with the British soldiers over it. The Act built tension between the two. (Griswold 23)On March 5, 1770 the dreadful day came. A mob of people went in front of the Customs Office in Boston Massachusetts and started to throw stuff and turn over insults at the soldiers. As a result to this so-called harassment the soldiers ejectd on the crowd. The first to die was a black man named Crispus Attucks. He was a native of Frainghan, Massachusetts. He escaped from slavery in 1750 and had become a sailor. Crispus Attucks is considered the first martyr of the American Independence (Mahin 1). The four others who died were Samuel gray, a rope maker James Caldwell, a sailor Samuel Maverick, a seventeen year old apprentice and Patrick Carr, a leather worker and Irish immigrant. All in which were unarmed and brutally murdered. The soldiers killed three, mortally wounded two others, and wounded six. How much ha... ...at were stationed in Boston were guilty for many other crimes. I cipher either the soldiers should crap been guilty for firing without an order or that Preston should have been guilty for giving the order to fire. According to Liesenfelt, the eight men said they were following Preston orders and should be try at one time (1). So the soldiers are saying they were following orders which means Preston is guilty. Also three black witnesses gave testimony that they did hear an order to fire by Preston. Then again a merchant said he did not hear an order. Either way the soldiers and/or Preston should have been guilty. I think it a lot easier to miss something said than to be hearing things. So the evidence is there that Preston gave an order to fire. I feel the verdict of the trial of the Boston Massacre should have been &8220guilty. The victims were unarmed and brutally murdered. I soldier enraged the citizens and were guilty of many other crimes. The order to fire give from Preston proves he&8217s guilty of the crime of manslaughter. My conclusion is that the soldiers and/or Preston are guilty. &8220Half a pale of blood had been spilled into he snow (Mahin 2).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.